Ethan Ross

Lol, yeah I gave extra special attention to the footer. It'll work on an 800x600 res and IE6, so yeah..

http://www.anglogermanracing.com/wtd/v3 thoughts and feedback on the atmosphere of the site, concerned somewhat at present that the navigation may not be 'present' enough and may be getting outshone by other layout elements. portfolio section returns a PHP error this I know. I've cross-checked it, it's W3C validated.

The white one is horrific.

I love it and have no problem with a solid color scheme.

Looks good, might want to reconsider the host, takes a long time to contact that server.

Looks pretty good, I'd want at last 100 for that.

Site works now, looks really good and professional.

I think the red on white text where it has 'server error' is pretty good. I've always liked solid red on white. I don't like the fonting on "An unexpected internal error has occurred. Our technical support team have been made aware of this and are working to remedy it. We apologise for this inconvenience." could be more creative than arial. good work tho

Some of you might remember my portfolio, white tree. Unfortunately it was a big too bogged down with Java and the cross-compatability was often an issue. The site was also non-compliant and I feel as though I may have effectively bitten off more than I can chew. I've reworked the site to make it a bit more cross-browser friendly and it should be compliant now. Feel free to give me some feedback: http://whitetreedesign.co.cc/

After the feedback I plan to do a bit of an overhaul.

My weakest parts are my fonting and interface design.

Made a small change to the center identity piece, should be a bit better now, here's a comparison:

May be a bandwidth issue, the site is quite heavy.

The site should work fine on anything 1024x768 or larger, but I'll look into it.

I've made the change now, see if it fits better.

I actually considered the navigation a while ago, and I felt though it may become a problem. Do you feel I need to make the navigation a bit more obvious? (I'm specifically refering to the navigation in the content areas, such as the close option and the back options while viewing portfolio segments.) Additionally do you have any suggestions to take the edge off of what you'd say may be the contrast between sharpness and softness? I feel as though potentially changing the font of the core navigational menu as well as dropping the solid bars on either side of each navigational element may help.

I'd appreciate a bit of feedback: http://whitetreedesign.co.cc/

It owns.

The older one is infinitely better.

I'm surprised no one has commented on this so far, so I figure I will. I like it. Generally it all fits together well, it's smooth and it works. There's not much more I can say about it, heh.

You've got a fine grasp of color and structure. Well done, good job.

OP: Looks great good work. Firefox users: This is a problem with Firefox 3.0, not his Flash.

I like it but I'd drop those arrow-shaped headers.

There is no content yet, which I said, I was looking for feedback on the visual feel.

I like it just fine, don't web 2.0 it to death, the colors are great, black and orange are always a fine bet. Looks navigable and easily readable.