April 29, 200917 yr The site is here: http://www.phpfaber.com Still much work to do with this new look, but I think it is ready to show it to somebody and get some strict opinions and comments! So if you have several minutes, you are welcome to criticize our work. Thank you! -Eugene Golovan.
April 29, 200917 yr Hey there Its rare for me to see a site and struggle for critiques, the design is excellent a few areas could do with improvement, im unsure as to the different fonts on the pages cant decide if i like it or dont; design wise its good but does it work for a website - i wouldnt say so. The first thing that occured to me on the home splash page was ; what is this ? I would maybe suggest lowering the opacity of the pattern and leaving the Enter part more evident, or even a slight adjustment in colour might work too. Just to make it that little bit more recognisable - remember what looks good to us doesnt necessarily mean itll look good and easily navigate for a random visitor. Aside from that its very different to anything ive seen and definately has the unique factor, good work
April 30, 200917 yr Wow phpfaber is still alive and kicking - I remember with early versions of your Topsite script!
May 1, 200917 yr Wow phpfaber is still alive and kicking - I remember with early versions of your Topsite script! hehe BTW, site looks really nice
May 1, 200917 yr It is a good looking site but there are some things which I'd look at... 1. The Copy! This needs, at the very least, copy-editing as it is riddled with mistakes that dent your credibility. 2. The template thumbnail thing top right could do with a title to explain what it is. 3. Text size, positioning, padding and spacing is a bit inconsistent - in places cramped, in others hard to read. 4. You're using in-line styling in your markup and there's an awful lot going on in the XHTML that's far from semantic. 5. The actual content is a long way down the page - most of the space before the fold is header. 6. It doesn't really flow and guide visitors through relevant pages and to a sale. Nothing too much wrong with the site but it does look (especially in the markup) like a customised template that's overly-complex and into which the content has been shoe-horned afterwards. If it was me I'd simplify the design a little, give the content some room to breathe and work on creating pathways through the site. Maybe it's just because it's early and I'm grumpy!
Create an account or sign in to comment