kennyadex

ouch, that is one PACKED homepage (excuse the pun), I see you like to store as much as possible online as well as in your business.. not a good impression, a good point is that I know what it is you do almost straight away, bad point is that if I wanted to use your services I have no idea what I should do next with your hidden phone number in the footer and your annoying 'in the way' chat box on the right I think I would simply leave and go elsewhere.
 
Accessibility is a good thing, people being able to read your site is a good thing.. huge over the top text.. not so much, the impression I get from it is ' I'm desperate so I will make what I am saying as big as possible'. So much red, contrast is good, too much and it removes from everything else, if everything else was not so massive you could have used font weights, colour, position, hiraki and form to define everything.

why all the images for text? makes the page too flabby and it's not accessible (to those who browse only via text or can't see images)
 
also disabling right-click is so pointless (and counter-accesible) that i haven't seen it for years. if people want your images then there are numerous easy ways to save them (cache, screenshot, web developer toollbar, disable js...)
 
why the different styles of illustration in the slider? the modern one is nice. the pink panther style one isn't. not keen on the serif font for the slider - the clean and functional sans-serif used elsewhere would be the obvious choice for an easy functinal box service. and the large initial capitals looks amateurish and old fashioned
 
i know the offset alignment of the list is more interesting but if the seeling point of your service is that it's easy then i would left align all the steps (with all numbers on the left)
 
not sure why i need to hover the amount of boxes to see how much it costs - put the prices there any way then i can compare and choose more quickly: this is london - people are busy!

looks like a pro

7-8/10

Hi,
 
It would be great to get some feedback on my new Responsive Website. Many thanks
 
URL: www.dcpweb.co.uk

Hello wonderful people, I will be so happy if you can review this website. Am a developer in Africa.
Am wondering what you guys would think. Its important you say something, It would men a lot to me.
 
Thanks in advance. Cheers!
 
http://www.sethric.com

I have to agree with Fuzzy Logic. The quality of a logo depends a lot on the context. Which brand values that you are trying to comunicate? What emotions would you like the target audience to link to the brand or product. The only general qualities of a logo is that it should be easy to recognize, fast to interpret and adapt well to different sizes and media (eg BW, inverted BW, greyscale, alternative colors). Both logos meet those demands very well but they have very different communicative values. I would consider the first one (with the arrow) to signal values like: inventiveness, progression and efficiency where the second one seems to me to signal qualities like: reflection, research and analysis.

WIthout doubt the first one excels in quality as compared to thy sibling.

I like the colors and the font, but i think the font size should be the same for all three words. Can't read it well otherwise!

shouln't LTD have a period after it to show it's an abbreviation?!
 
would have preferred sethric in a heavier contrasting weight

Yes the logo is fine...

consider the length of the logo . I think colors combination are perfect, but the font of "Media" shouldnt same w/ before, IMHO

Hello. I like your site, it is very clean and professional looking. I will say that some of the navigation feels off when I am moving around the site. When you click on the services and go to the separate pages, going back to the main menu does not feel right. I don't mind going to the welcome page when I first come to your site, but then to keep having to go back there, seems off. I think it would be better to go back to the services instead. Just a thought I wanted to pass on. Take care.

All the internal pages look out of place other than the portfolio page http://sethric.com/ext/portfolio4
 
You need to add social media links into that page as well as in the footer as the only link that works in the footer is the facebook one
.
I'm not sure about the big white space under the follow us banner. Is this meant to be there?
 
The active state on the menu is a little out as it shows I am on the clients section but I can only see the contact us section.
 
The our clients section, if you click on an image and roll over the arrows (at the edge of the screen) they swap out, should they have a different roll over or should this not be there?
 
Within the portfolio page you may want to check your links as the E3 Consult goes to a Domain holding page and the Rosfon site is forbidden (to name a few as you have 8 on the first page then you have placeholders)

.htaccess matey.
Options +FollowSymlinks RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / Rewritecond %{HTTP_HOST} !^sethric\.com RewriteRule (.*) http://sethric.com/$1 [R=301,L] Or the reverse to force it to www ...
 
Options +FollowSymlinks RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / Rewritecond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.sethric\.com RewriteRule (.*) http://www.sethric.com/$1 [R=301,L] Although yes you can set a preferred with Google it does not prevent http://domain.com/page.html and http://www.domain.com/page.html existing which is a common duplicate content pit to fall in.

Hmmm ... the first landing is 'ok' but I've seen 100s of other sites using this very same look, plugin delight eh.
Also huge difference between your main landing page and http://sethric.com/services/webdesign which is (sorry to say) sketchy. I'm not really sure what you were going for here.
 
I would suggest making the site uniform, use the base of the main landing throughout the rest of the site.
 
Just my 2 pence worth.

A View Desktop link is only relevant if you have a separate mobile variant of a website. A website created using Bootstrap is responsive, i.e. it adapts automatically to every device type and resolution; there is no separate desktop site to switch to. Tell your client you are using a more contemporary approach which doesn't require what they are asking for. If they are still in doubt, suggest they read the Bootstrap home page: http://getbootstrap.com/

http://rlcoaching.com and http://www.rlcoaching.com are seen by search engines as 2 separate websites with the same content, which is damaging for SEO. You should redirect the non-www version, or vice versa by putting this in your .htaccess file:
 
 
RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^rlcoaching.com RewriteRule (.*) http://www.rlcoaching.com/$1 [R=301,L]

A few user experience and SEO observations:
 
The site isn't responsive so it doesn't scale to low resolution desktop displays (although it does render well on my phone). If your browser is less than around 1140px, the menu is cropped. At 1090px items in the right position are cropped. About 10% of my clients' website visitors fall into that category. The title and description tags are the same on every page, which isn't good for SEO. Also, the description is very long; ideally it should be less than 160 characters. You have multiple h1 tags. Consider making the second one an h2. The URLs aren't search engine friendly. Your images don't have alt tags. The non-www variant of the URL doesn't redirect to the www variant. Google will see this as duplicate content. The email address on the contact page is in plain text; you'll get tons of spam. The labels on the contact form don't align to the fields. The banner image on every page says nothing about the service being provided or the coach providing it. It's taking up a lot of real estate, pushing valuable content below the fold without really serving a purpose. I didn't intend this to be overly critical, rather a list of a few simple fixes that would make the site more successful without a lot of rework.