September 1, 201114 yr Hello, I have started working on a stock website (flash and graphics) and I would need a feedback on it, because it's on a beta stage. Also if you can tell me on which type of sites to advertise it (on web design and design blogs I don't think it will be ok, because those people don't need something already done...) The site is : TinyWebMart.com Thanks in advance. Edited September 1, 201114 yr by johnny_laslo
September 1, 201114 yr It looks pretty nice! One thing though, I recommend removing the contact box in the footer and putting it on its own page. If you don't want to move it to another page you should add some padding between the text box and the submit button 'cause they're overlapping
September 1, 201114 yr Author It looks pretty nice! One thing though, I recommend removing the contact box in the footer and putting it on its own page. If you don't want to move it to another page you should add some padding between the text box and the submit button 'cause they're overlapping There is also a contact page... I think I will add something else in that spot. Thanks.
September 5, 201114 yr Well since no one else seems to be interested I think I'll go for round two 1. In the "Get in Touch" section of the footer it says "All the fiels sold on TinyWebMart.com" 2. In "What We Do" firstly tinywebhut.com doesn't exist maybe you should change it to tinywebmart.com (ditto for the testimonials part)? Secondly it says "flash compnents" 3. In your nav bar, the second item is "Flash Componenents" 4. In 'Graphics and Templates' on "Moda Fashion template" it says "...from fashion and parfumes to..." 5. You're title is the same on every page. Maybe you should make it reflect the content of the page? 6. In the blue box on your homepage it says "Each purchesed item has attached a detailed" That's all I found but I'd recommend spell-checking it... It's a nice design though
September 5, 201114 yr May i ask why have you designed the whole site using tables? And you have two sets of the same javascript for your rollovers. And whats with the prices it just got Price3, Price2, etc. Edited September 5, 201114 yr by Antony Brown
September 5, 201114 yr the site looks good but the serious issue here is the fact that the site is made entirely from tables???? are you using Dreamweaver 1912 version? i would really look to convert the site into CSS and div's as tables are deprecated (at least for layout they are) and no one uses them anymore. Edited September 5, 201114 yr by person4659
September 5, 201114 yr People have hit on good stuff so far. Tables have to go, no question there. Site loads really slow No validation on the contact form (just a message saying everything is required) Logo looks awful with the drop shadow. Typography is really sloppy and unrefined. Body copy is way too small. Other than that it's a pretty typical layout, if you convert this to divs and refine it should be fine.
September 5, 201114 yr Top of your website says "Work harder on yourself than you do on your job." Huh?!
September 8, 201114 yr Author Malick - the spell check still needs to be done; As for the tables, they are used to arrange some of the content. The site is built with css and divs. oakleaves - in that section there are a few random quotes about work.. Thanks all Edited September 8, 201114 yr by johnny_laslo
September 8, 201114 yr You aren't supposed to use tables for ANYTHING except laying out data that belongs in a table, like an excel doc. What you have there can EASILY be done with CSS, and would be more maintainable and scalable. The professional way to build sites is separating structure and presentation, and you are using markup (structure) for presentation, so that's a big no no. This isn't a subjective thing, it's a web fact nowadays. The other points people have mentioned are still valid, I wouldn't dismiss them.
September 8, 201114 yr I'll be honest, it's not great, mainly for the reasons listed above. The logo needs a lot of work, as does the front end code.
September 10, 201114 yr The design looked great, but only after I checked it on my home PC. Devices with a small screen require the user to scroll around, because the page doesn't resize on smaller screens.
Create an account or sign in to comment