Hello Everyone.

This is my site http://webandpeople.com

 

It took a lot of time to do...Though I feel something is not right there.

 

Image attached is a new design variation for my site.

How do you think which one the best? existing or the new one?

 

Hi Erni

 

I fully agree - about the box at the base.

 

It is a spiral staircase to nowhere and needs sorting.

 

There are also other areas where the word presentation is rather weak.

 

The website itself - has an excellent overall ring about it, and a lot of thought has obviously gone into it.

 

The standard you saw in vision isn’t far away, because what needs doing is so very minor.

 

I would go with the original and strengthen what you actually do with a package of impact.

 

Good luck

Hi, I prefer your current site, one thing I would say on the design front is it does look a tad generic, does have a template feel to it.

 

There are a number of grammatical errors and this wont make a good immpression with potential clients, your text makes for difficult reading.

 

On the plus side your site validates, and on first impression does look proffesional.

Thanks for reviews!

 

Looks like in general my site does good expression.

 

But yes, my english is very weak need to do with it something... May be should ask professionals to fix all mistakes.

<3 the colors and the design is overall nice. It could use some tweaks, but I think to any visitor who is not a designer it will still have a very stunning effect.

<3 the colors and the design is overall nice. It could use some tweaks, but I think to any visitor who is not a designer it will still have a very stunning effect.

Strange... According to my google analytics - people from Canada do not like this website at all! thanks for your review

What happens when they click "no" to "are you looking for a new web solution?". hehe.

The window is closes)))...

The idea to start dialogue with person from very first page - deserves to live, I think.

Could anyone give an example of something similar on the web?

I have looked but haven't found.

Lovely site, a recommendation would be to not use tables to structure the website. Other than that, looks & works well.

I agree with T_Break about it looking like a template and it's basically for no other reason that the model.

 

I think you could lose the model and keep the clouds and it would look less template like and lose a little of that over-corporate look too.

 

The only other consideration is it took me a moment or two to locate work examples and I was almost about to give up. You're probably thinking what a weirdo - but this is usability defined.

 

A final point is I am at a loss at to understand. The markup contains a few tables when clearly your markup suggests you know enough about standards based design to not use them for styling. Is there any reason?

Thanks for your time!

 

Well! Looks like the mark is good in average, the only thing - tables in markup, many don't like them, but I don't see anything bad in them (... I'll try to understand why tables are bad. and next time will reject them.

Screams template thanks to the website's lady-friend.

It does look very templatey and generic, but quite a well done one! I think you really need to look at the text before you worry too much more about the graphics... there are more mistakes in the text and it's more generic and ineffective than anything to do with the design.

It does look very templatey and generic, but quite a well done one! I think you really need to look at the text before you worry too much more about the graphics... there are more mistakes in the text and it's more generic and ineffective than anything to do with the design.

Well, I can't write texts! I can just write working code!)))

 

Well, I'm working on texts. Thanks to all.

http://www.workingwith.me.uk/table_free/se...o_go_table_free

 

#why not to use tables for design