Why is Firefox The best? Answers all here!
#42
Posted 01 December 2008 - 01:55 PM
If it wasn't for Adblock Plus and the Web Developer extension, I'd switch to Opera in a Flash. FF3 is quite unstable at times.
#45
Posted 15 December 2008 - 07:23 AM
Alexander, on Jun 6 2007, 07:10, said:
http://echo3.net/firefox/?bubbles
Enjoy!
Because... it just is
#46
Posted 16 December 2008 - 10:02 AM
#47
Posted 30 January 2009 - 03:48 AM
#48
Posted 30 January 2009 - 04:27 AM
Memory leaks, a bit sluggish, consumes alot of resources (compared to some).
However it blows IE out the water, and the plugins just make it the most essential browser, a must have in your arsenal. The amount of plugins i have for FF is ridiculous. Although i don't use it for general browsing anymore, just development, and certain sites that don't work with other browsers (like online banking, you'd think with the amount of money they have it'd work in all browsers.... geeeze).
#50
Posted 13 February 2009 - 01:31 PM
#51
Posted 13 February 2009 - 02:20 PM
The memory leaks are still a problem with FF (i have to restart FF every few hours, and it doesn't always terminate itself which mean ctrl alt del. on vista which is a pain).
It has good plugins, actually it has some amazing plugins.
But for general day to day use i don't need all the plugins, FF3 still has some issues that were around in FF1, why aren't they fixed yet?
Personally, i think chrome looks promising if it can get the plugin platform right, and fix some annoying issues. Chrome v2 now supports middle click scrolling (shouldn't that always be there though). Chrome's gonna take a while to properly get off the ground.
I do love alot of things in FF, but after a few months of chrome, it feels so clunky and cluttered, it seems slow.
But i need webdeveloper toolbar, firebug, pixelperfect amongst other things, so FF will always have a use.
#52
Posted 13 February 2009 - 04:25 PM
#53
Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:22 PM
The amount of ram FF takes just increases and increases the longer it's open, until i restart it.
Checked and it's FF v 3.0.6
Quote
Chromium 2.0.160.0
Memory:
- Private: 161,976k
- Shared: 11,247k
- Total: 173,223k
Virtual memory:
- Private: 151,440k
- Mapped: 121,020k
Quote
Memory:
- Private: 295,436k
- Shared: 12,040k
- Total: 307,476k
Virtual Memory:
- Private: 259,384k
- Mapped: 31,548k
Taken from chrome stats page, chrome has 9 Tabs open (6 on wdf, one index tab, one on 18185.co.uk and the stats tab).
Firefox has my gmx emails open. Although gmx mail i suspect is probably a bit resource heavy, and it doesn't work in chrome.
But those stats show a good efficiency in chrome, however an unfair comparison.
#54
Posted 13 February 2009 - 06:38 PM
What is your OS?
When is the last time you reinstalled your OS?
#55
Posted 13 February 2009 - 08:04 PM
I googled it, i may check out some of the 'fixes'
http://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1GGLS...ox+memory+leaks
#56
Posted 13 February 2009 - 08:31 PM
#57
Posted 13 February 2009 - 09:17 PM
Vista takes roughly double xp's resources, with my spec, vista should be able to run a browser fine.
#59
Posted 13 February 2009 - 11:56 PM
#60
Posted 14 February 2009 - 12:12 AM
bocaj, on Feb 13 2009, 21:17, said:
Vista takes roughly double xp's resources, with my spec, vista should be able to run a browser fine.
I'm a new vista user (4 months or so) and have had endless problems with it, not just involving FF3. I used to love xp and the xp/ff combo worked great but vista/ff3 is like being stabbed in the arse. Very painful!
My main pc is dual booted with Fedora and FF3 is brilliant when running that, likewise when I run my Ubuntu machine. It just doesn't seem to get along with Vista in my experience. And my pc is only 4 months old with decent(ish) spec.
#61
Posted 11 March 2009 - 05:02 PM
#62
Posted 27 April 2009 - 03:38 PM
- ← Use Google's Gmail as Google FTP Storage space - Google FTP
- Web Browsers
- Firefox doesn't recognise russian Text →
Help


























