I'm the bad guy folks. I used a few images from google images. Shoot me now...
*bang* (for want of proper shooting smiley)
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:27 AM
I'm the bad guy folks. I used a few images from google images. Shoot me now...
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:31 AM
Fair point.Yeah, but this is my job, so I have a reputation and a career to maintain. So I can't really be sitting here saying you pinching images off Google is OK.
Edited by jamesosix, 16 March 2012 - 10:32 AM.
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:31 AM
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:35 AM
Fair point.
Soooo, whilst on this heated subject. Any suggestions for a fair priced image service?
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:43 AM
Edited by brightonmike, 16 March 2012 - 10:44 AM.
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:01 AM
Edited by 4colourprogress, 16 March 2012 - 11:14 AM.
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:02 AM
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:34 AM
That is decent value, no doubt about it, but personally that is well out of my scope of affordability. I also wouldnt need that amount of images on a yearly basis, nevermind a monthly basis.For £149 per month, Shutterstock allow you to download 25 images a day and the licence includes most commercial usage. It works out about 750 images, and 750 images for £149 is peanuts. Works out at about 20p each.
Yes, you probably don't want to pay £149 every month, but you could just take it out for one month, download your 750 images, and have a bank of 750 images you can use for future projects.
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:38 AM
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:41 AM
Maybe a pay-as-you-go kind of service? Obviously I know I would end up paying a bit more, on a per image basis, but such is the way when you are not earning a decent profit from your work.
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:42 AM
Thanks, their microprice option probably would be my best bet. Will look into that further. CheersReflexstock.
They are national based, and the work is for the company I work for, and they would never allow me to do that. I see your point though. Plus I prefer images that have more to them, than just a picture of x car on x forecourt. Hmm.You mentioned that you do a lot of work for car sales places.
Have you not thought about nipping down one day to the clients place and taking a bunch of images that you could re-use? You'd save yourself a lot of money and time in the long run. If you don't have a camera then even hiring one would work out cheaper than a subscription to a stock site.
If you're like me, useless with a camera, do what i do and get a mate who's good and sort him a few pints in return for a bit of snapping.
Edited by jamesosix, 16 March 2012 - 11:45 AM.
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:50 AM
Posted 16 March 2012 - 11:51 AM
I love ENVATO stores. I'll look into photodune, but they seem a bit more expensive than Reflexstock. Hmm. We will see. Depends on the next job, and what they need/want/willing to pay for.PhotoDune is quite good as well.
Yeah I seen one of those deals recently it included wp themes, icons, and images. Next time i see something similar I'll get on it, if costs allow.Yeah PhotoDune hasn't been around long and the Envato people often have deals where they sell massive amounts of stuff for like $25 so that's worth checking out too.
Edited by jamesosix, 16 March 2012 - 11:53 AM.
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:10 PM
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:14 PM
SometimesDon't you just love happy endings
Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:27 PM
Posted 16 March 2012 - 01:04 PM
hope you paid for that
Posted 22 March 2012 - 03:56 PM
Posted 25 March 2012 - 06:33 PM
Posted 26 March 2012 - 01:54 PM
i think that sounds a pretty solid solution tbh. If you invite the orginal author(s) to get in touch, then what more can you do?I have another situation regarding images and I'd like some guidance.
I'm making a post where I showoff some "fishing things you don't see everyday" which will have 15 or so images I've found and think are pretty amusing/funny.
The problem is I have no idea where the original credits should go to with these images. They seem lost on the net and difficult to find the source of. The pages I have found the images on have some disclaimer that says, "I did not take these images"--so they have been scraped before and many sites have the images. These images are not professional and look like joe-schmoes came across these odd situations while fishing and snapped a photo.
I think its a great post and my game plan would be to note that I did not take the pictures and I'll invite the authors of the photos to email me and I will take them down or pay to purchase them.
What would you do?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users