Is linux better then windows?
#1
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:33 PM
#2
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:40 PM
I have worked on many OS's such as Windows (2000, XP, Vista, 7 and 8 ), MAC OSX and Linux (a handful of different compiles) and i currently choose to use Windows Vista or 7 and will probably move to 8 as and when.
This post has been edited by MikeChipshop: 27 January 2012 - 01:40 PM
#3
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:44 PM
MikeChipshop, on 27 January 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:
I have worked on many OS's such as Windows (2000, XP, Vista, 7 and 8 ), MAC OSX and Linux (a handful of different compiles) and i currently choose to use Windows Vista or 7 and will probably move to 8 as and when.
well i must say for now atleast imma stick with linux, quick question though, i noticed i can't reinstall windows vista with linux already installed it says the hardrive has to be in NTS something format i forget anyways what would u do to reinstall windows if i decided to at a later time
#4
Posted 27 January 2012 - 03:20 PM
#5
Posted 27 January 2012 - 03:28 PM
This post has been edited by CSN-UK: 27 January 2012 - 03:31 PM
#6
Posted 27 January 2012 - 03:33 PM
The only thing that really seems to differentiate them is hardware and software support. If you need a specific input device that doesn't have Linux drivers you might consider switching to a different OS... and I'm not sure if they have Creative Suite for Linux... but beyond problems of that ilk I can't see any reason to work with something you aren't completely comfortable with.
#7
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:11 PM
porkchops, on 27 January 2012 - 03:33 PM, said:
The only thing that really seems to differentiate them is hardware and software support. If you need a specific input device that doesn't have Linux drivers you might consider switching to a different OS... and I'm not sure if they have Creative Suite for Linux... but beyond problems of that ilk I can't see any reason to work with something you aren't completely comfortable with.
i run two laptops, one with win 7 and another with linux mint on. TBH I prefer the linux box, its on a aging lappy and it runs super fast. as for web work on it i've got a decent code editor on it (bluefish) and for graphics got the decent GIMP. As long as you are not compleatly locked in to Adobe products, linux will do you fine. I think WINE supports adobe cs1, but don't quote me on that.
#8
Posted 27 January 2012 - 11:06 PM
#9
Posted 28 January 2012 - 04:05 AM
webdesigner93, on 27 January 2012 - 01:33 PM, said:
I recommend Google Chrome os its the best!
#13
Posted 01 February 2012 - 11:56 PM
#17
Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:14 PM
#18
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:26 PM
webdesigner93, on 03 February 2012 - 04:34 PM, said:
Ubuntu is ok, I used to use it, but I've now switched to Linux Mint, It's based on Ubuntu, but has a cleaner interface then the "marmite" (love it or hate it) unity desktop.
#19
Posted 08 February 2012 - 06:23 AM
#21
Posted 08 February 2012 - 08:47 AM
Here's a page that benchmarks Windows 7 against the release of Ubuntu that was current when Win7 was first released. Makes for pretty interesting reading actually http://www.tuxradar.com/node/33
#22
Posted 08 February 2012 - 08:57 AM
notbanksy, on 08 February 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:
Here's a page that benchmarks Windows 7 against the release of Ubuntu that was current when Win7 was first released. Makes for pretty interesting reading actually http://www.tuxradar.com/node/33
I'm all for seeing which one is better but benchmarks like this really only tell a small story. I'd like to see a full test including hot spot ananalys and also from an impartial source. Of course none of that would matter at the end of the day as having used Ubuntu for long period of time I know it's not for me.
#23
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:01 AM
MikeChipshop, on 08 February 2012 - 08:57 AM, said:
Haha yep I'd like to see that too. And definitely from an impartial source, although if you read that article, you'd be surprised how fair it is. Mind you, might be a different story if Ubuntu didn't *win* most of the tests! ;p
The comments are pretty interesting on that page though.
#24
Posted 08 February 2012 - 12:31 PM
#25
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:30 PM
brightonmike, on 08 February 2012 - 12:31 PM, said:
I found that after the initial novelty wore off it was just a case of "so... now I just have to use this?". Fun to set up and mess around with, not great to use full time in my opinion.
#26
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:34 PM
I'd like to see an OS really push the boat out and try to, even if not succeed, revolutionise the interface.
I think the Metro UI is a possible step in this direction. Someone needs to do some crazy, innovative, different.
That would make the whole Which OS debate much more interesting, rather than just choosing between three that pretty much all look and work the same way.
#27
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:39 PM
Quote
No, it is simply a matter of personal preference.
This post has been edited by oakleaves: 08 February 2012 - 01:40 PM
#28
Posted 08 February 2012 - 02:04 PM
brightonmike, on 08 February 2012 - 01:34 PM, said:
I'd like to see an OS really push the boat out and try to, even if not succeed, revolutionise the interface.
I think the Metro UI is a possible step in this direction. Someone needs to do some crazy, innovative, different.
That would make the whole Which OS debate much more interesting, rather than just choosing between three that pretty much all look and work the same way.
There's been some great innovations and frankly weird implementations in OS design over the years. Many are just replacements for the explorer.exe in Windows. With a decent hex editor and a little knowledge on how to get round the restrictions, you can build a pretty crazy interface. However decades of usability studies all point to what we have now. Windows, task bars and icons.
#29
Posted 08 February 2012 - 02:30 PM
brightonmike, on 08 February 2012 - 01:34 PM, said:
I'd like to see an OS really push the boat out and try to, even if not succeed, revolutionise the interface.
I think the Metro UI is a possible step in this direction. Someone needs to do some crazy, innovative, different.
That would make the whole Which OS debate much more interesting, rather than just choosing between three that pretty much all look and work the same way.
I'd like to be able to control the interface with my face.
#30
Posted 08 February 2012 - 02:32 PM
http://www.neowin.ne...e-tracking-tool
This post has been edited by MikeChipshop: 08 February 2012 - 03:16 PM
#31
Posted 08 February 2012 - 02:34 PM
brightonmike, on 08 February 2012 - 01:34 PM, said:
I'd like to see an OS really push the boat out and try to, even if not succeed, revolutionise the interface.
I think the Metro UI is a possible step in this direction. Someone needs to do some crazy, innovative, different.
That would make the whole Which OS debate much more interesting, rather than just choosing between three that pretty much all look and work the same way.
MikeChipshop, on 08 February 2012 - 02:04 PM, said:
brightonmike, on 08 February 2012 - 01:34 PM, said:
There's been some great innovations and frankly weird implementations in OS design over the years. Many are just replacements for the explorer.exe in Windows. With a decent hex editor and a little knowledge on how to get round the restrictions, you can build a pretty crazy interface. However decades of usability studies all point to what we have now. Windows, task bars and icons.
I think you've both hit the nail on the head, it's important to understand that in everything we do there is a pattern or routine (and we like routines and patterns) that are common place and as such allows us simply to identify a device or software and use it appropriately.
The same can be said for design (web, graphic or otherwise), despite being creative... both consciously and sub consciously, you are simply re-designing based on heuristics and inputs that you are accustom to and have experienced.
As such good practice and usability heuristics follow on with this pattern, as these are simply derived from identifying commonly used designs or implementations in certain situations... the more the said design or implementation is used the more accepted it becomes and as such becomes a defacto as the routine becomes common knowledge.
As for the whole OS debate, it is fairly flawed if you are comparing the GUI's, as in reality we as the user never deal with the operating system first hand, we are only able to communicate to it via its interfaces and these as has been said are variations of the same design, method and implementation and are such open to a matter of opinion.
The fact that windows currently is the standard could be its interfaces, but dig deeper and as hinted in the paragraph above you would or should start to think "if they have the same or similar gui's, methods or routines... there must be something else ... something i cant see...?"... leading on...
The functional difference and performance aspects should be the comparative method, however it is important to note that windows does not used shared GUI interfaces unlike the linux (most, or mac) and as such does have greater overheads to contend with performance wise.
The core of windows, linux (and the mac OS) however all have their very different purposes but share many of the same goals/objectives.
Something to have stimulated the mind i hope
This post has been edited by CSN-UK: 08 February 2012 - 02:53 PM
#33
Posted 11 February 2012 - 12:22 AM
Getting my new desktop on Tuesday though woo hoo!
Matt
#34
Posted 20 February 2012 - 01:02 AM
Help
























