Rank 2 Site Black Hat SEO?
#1
Posted 18 August 2011 - 07:46 AM
My client has paid someone to do the SEO on the website last year he is now rank 2 for certain keywords however the SEO looks like black hat SEO to me check it out here: http://gallaghermarq....com/index.html
I am re-designing the website for him should I re-do the SEO work to make it white hat? will he loose it rank 2 position?
Thanks
#2
Posted 18 August 2011 - 08:54 AM
If need be, take them to this site and let them see why black hat is a no no.
Open and honest is always the way forward.
#3
Posted 18 August 2011 - 09:11 AM
#4
Posted 18 August 2011 - 09:11 AM
#5
Posted 18 August 2011 - 10:04 AM
CQ Website Design, on 18 August 2011 - 07:46 AM, said:
My client has paid someone to do the SEO on the website last year he is now rank 2 for certain keywords however the SEO looks like black hat SEO to me check it out here: http://gallaghermarq....com/index.html
I am re-designing the website for him should I re-do the SEO work to make it white hat? will he loose it rank 2 position?
Thanks
I have checked the website. You better re design it and make sure that you are out of sand box. to check sand box try this tool: http://www.searcheng...box-checker.htm
#6
Posted 18 August 2011 - 11:27 AM
To be honest, looking at the title tag and other bits, that you can't do much wrong.
This post has been edited by neil0wen: 18 August 2011 - 11:35 AM
#7
Posted 18 August 2011 - 11:39 AM
However if you look at the sites competing with your client, they are not that great themselves. The top websites content is mostly bullet points, which is really bad for SEO and also have a very low amount of baclinks.
#8
Posted 18 August 2011 - 01:07 PM
Thanks
This post has been edited by CQ Website Design: 18 August 2011 - 01:23 PM
#9
Posted 18 August 2011 - 04:21 PM
If you remove keywords from the main page that he is ranking for correctly you will lose something. If you change urls that he has backlinked, you will lose rthe affect of those backlinks.
Keep page names, make a nice design, use more h1 tags, keep orignal or improved text. job done.
#10
Posted 19 August 2011 - 08:14 AM
kingy da killa, on 18 August 2011 - 09:11 AM, said:
Wrong - It's god awful advice like this that makes me lol at this section of the forum sometimes.
@OP: After a quick look over it I can't see too much wrong with the site, definately no huge blackhat techniques. Only thing I'd say that look amiss is the spammy titles tags that aren't helping anyone.
#11
Posted 19 August 2011 - 09:59 AM
rallport, on 19 August 2011 - 08:14 AM, said:
@OP: After a quick look over it I can't see too much wrong with the site, definately no huge blackhat techniques. Only thing I'd say that look amiss is the spammy titles tags that aren't helping anyone.
i just figured if a black hat tehciqnue got him to rank 2, and he didden get banned for over a year... then its very unlikely he will and worth keeping if it ment good traffic.
im no seo exspert or anything thou ovsuily!
just makes sense to me
#12
Posted 19 August 2011 - 10:01 AM
kingy da killa, on 19 August 2011 - 09:59 AM, said:
im no seo exspert or anything thou ovsuily!
just makes sense to me
Isn't it a bit like saying i haven't paid my taxes in over a year but i haven't been caught so it must be legal?
#14
Posted 19 August 2011 - 12:47 PM
#15
Posted 19 August 2011 - 01:14 PM
rallport, on 19 August 2011 - 12:47 PM, said:
Spot on! In fact I have heard of some bad link building practices that are the same, they buy high PR sites and use them to link to sites. Although this may work over the short term, eventually these sites will be banned or at very least lose their high PR and will not help the sites they are linked too!
#16
Posted 19 August 2011 - 06:00 PM

as you know domain age just less then 3 months but visit this site : http://pelangsing-alami.com (one of the website I've developed for my client). Check the PR whole the entire site and what would you say?
I'm not do blackhat seo technique but why it happen I Don't know exactly. Can you explain about this mystery? cek this site as well (agenviagra[dot]com). the age of domain is same.
#17
Posted 20 August 2011 - 10:49 AM
Jasa Pembuatan Web, on 19 August 2011 - 06:00 PM, said:

as you know domain age just less then 3 months but visit this site : http://pelangsing-alami.com (one of the website I've developed for my client). Check the PR whole the entire site and what would you say?
I'm not do blackhat seo technique but why it happen I Don't know exactly. Can you explain about this mystery? cek this site as well (agenviagra[dot]com). the age of domain is same.
What's your point. Its only got a PR2?!
#18
Posted 20 August 2011 - 11:01 AM
Attached File(s)
-
Image1.jpg (40.22K)
Number of downloads: 5
This post has been edited by roothost: 20 August 2011 - 11:02 AM
#19
Posted 20 August 2011 - 11:01 AM
It's relatively easy to get a site to the top of google by using localised SEO (ie Marquee Hire Liverpool, or Marquee Hire Manchester)
The overall competition and searches is bound to be much lower so it is obviously going to be easier and quicker to rank for these 'long string keywords'.
I use this technique all the time, then build up to the more popular keywords.
#20
Posted 20 August 2011 - 05:06 PM
Jasa Pembuatan Web, on 19 August 2011 - 06:00 PM, said:

as you know domain age just less then 3 months but visit this site : http://pelangsing-alami.com (one of the website I've developed for my client). Check the PR whole the entire site and what would you say?
I'm not do blackhat seo technique but why it happen I Don't know exactly. Can you explain about this mystery? cek this site as well (agenviagra[dot]com). the age of domain is same.
Yes, you have a PR 4 within a pretty short space of time, great. Howveer, a high PR DOES NOT EQUAL good rankings in the serps - which your website proves
Also, lots of poor quality images, flashing gifs and adverts is no way to help with your CRO - which I imagine that site has lots of issues with.
Why do people fail to realise that SEO is two fold - getting visitors onto your site and ranking highly in the SERPs is only half of what SEO is. The other half is getting those visitors to actually convert into a sale (or whatever you measure this by). I had a rant about this a while ago on my blog - CRO and SEO – The Essential Realtionship
I see countless sites daily over optimized and appearing decently in the SERPs, only to have an awful website that fails to convert.
#21
Posted 21 August 2011 - 09:24 PM
Why not advertise the areas he covers? Makes common business sense to expand your target area and widen the net. In all fairness he is probably doing more harm then good at the moment by diluting the content and keywords.
It'll be interesting to see how people can sum up the difference between white and black hat SEO in a sentance
#22
Posted 23 August 2011 - 02:22 AM
rallport, on 20 August 2011 - 05:06 PM, said:
Also, lots of poor quality images, flashing gifs and adverts is no way to help with your CRO - which I imagine that site has lots of issues with.
Why do people fail to realise that SEO is two fold - getting visitors onto your site and ranking highly in the SERPs is only half of what SEO is. The other half is getting those visitors to actually convert into a sale (or whatever you measure this by). I had a rant about this a while ago on my blog - CRO and SEO – The Essential Realtionship
I see countless sites daily over optimized and appearing decently in the SERPs, only to have an awful website that fails to convert.
The main keyword is "pelangsing" after that pelangsing alami and all in page 1 (google.co.id). regarding image in website that's order from my client. actually I really really don't like with the web that have a lot of animation image etc. but this is order from them.
#23
Posted 23 August 2011 - 06:04 PM
Jasa Pembuatan Web, on 23 August 2011 - 02:22 AM, said:
What your conversion and bounce rates like? What the average visit length for your sites?
#24
Posted 24 August 2011 - 02:46 PM
CQ - There is nothing major wrong with this site (design aside) apart from over use of keywords. The links coming into the site aren't going to kill it, at worst they'll just be ignored if they are directory bulk links. It's certainly not worthy of being called a black hat site.
If it were me, I wouldn't panic about suddenly having to change everything. I would simply look at what needs to be improved, keep in mind your keyword usage, ensure you have your other on-page factors in place and transition the site to something that is more search engine safe. It won't damage the rankings.
Obviously if you change urls you'll need to ensure there are redirects in place but that's just commonsense right.
What is blackhat after all? It's just something that used to be whitehat till Google decided it was no longer acceptable!
Just as an example of what can happen:
I have a client who runs a limo hire business and has been using masses of "doorway pages" for the last 3-4 years. They are blatent, yet he's been ranking consistently high for years. Then Google started not to cache some pages on the site and the guy couldn't understand why. I explained the point about doorway pages. His answer was, my competitors are doing it and they are still ok, which again is a bit like saying "my neighbours don't pay taxes so why should I". Anyway, I explained to this guy that his site would start dropping in the rankings, more of his pages would not be cached and burying his head in the sand wouldn't solve the problem.
He decided he knew best and we parted company. 6 months later, he's back asking me to fix the problem.
At some point bad practice will get found out and it's better to make a smooth transition than have to panic fix and wait for Google to reinstate your site.
Help






















