Web Design Forum: @font-face vs cufon rendering - Web Design Forum

Jump to content

WDF
WDF Premium Memberships Reseller Hosting
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

@font-face vs cufon rendering Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   AndyDesigns 

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 248
  • Joined: 13-September 10
  • Reputation: 5
  • Gender:Male
  • Experience:Intermediate
  • Area of Expertise:Designer/Coder

Posted 10 January 2011 - 10:14 PM

Hi,

I was quite keen to have a go at using @font-face as I was currently using images to display non-standard fonts. By using Paul Irish's Bulletproof @font-face syntax I managed to get the font to display on all browsers.

However, the font-rendering was rather ugly, as though there was no anti-aliasing taking place. The font I am trying to use is chunkfive, after checking the live demo on font-squirrel it confirms that this font doesnt seem to render well in any modern browser.

However, I found another site showing the same font rendered using cufon and the results were ALOT better. Am I to assume some fonts render better than others using font-face, whereas with cufon your more likely to get the desired result?

I know cufon is a bit more complicated, but will certainly be looking into this further.
0

#2 User is online   cibgraphics 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 779
  • Joined: 11-September 08
  • Reputation: 75
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Utah, USA
  • Experience:Advanced
  • Area of Expertise:Designer/Coder

Posted 10 January 2011 - 11:38 PM

Im not too savy on how cufon works (I only know how to apply it). It could be that the font smoother only get applied to certain types of font formats and leaves the svg's fonts (which cufon gets turned into) alone. Again, I could be totally wrong. its just my best guess.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users