Where Do I stand - Client Related
#1
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:01 PM
I recently finished a eCommerce website for a client.
He's happy with the design/layout but is now saying it's not finished as all his existing products aren't on there (i've added him several categories and products as an example). He has 300 exisiting products. Hes has an admin area where he can add products himself.
No where the quote I provided him did it explicity say 'i'll add all the products for you'. He's saying that because he assumed I'd add these products for him and that because it doesn't specifically say this on the quote, that I should be 'finishing' the site for him by adding his exisiting products.
This is quite a job and products have multiple images, prices and attributes.
Where exactly do I stand here?
I mean if everyone thought like this they could come back and say add xxx feature to my site because i assumed you'd be doing it, it also doesn't say on the contract that you're not going to add feature xxx either. Surely his logic is absolutely flawed?
Any thoughts?
Ta
#2
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:10 PM
Personal opinion is that if you were hired to develop/design the website then it's up to your client to administer it. But I would need to see any contract/communications you had with them.
These scenarios are a pain in the ass
rallport, on 12 April 2010 - 04:01 PM, said:
I recently finished a eCommerce website for a client.
He's happy with the design/layout but is now saying it's not finished as all his existing products aren't on there (i've added him several categories and products as an example). He has 300 exisiting products. Hes has an admin area where he can add products himself.
No where the quote I provided him did it explicity say 'i'll add all the products for you'. He's saying that because he assumed I'd add these products for him and that because it doesn't specifically say this on the quote, that I should be 'finishing' the site for him by adding his exisiting products.
This is quite a job and products have multiple images, prices and attributes.
Where exactly do I stand here?
I mean if everyone thought like this they could come back and say add xxx feature to my site because i assumed you'd be doing it, it also doesn't say on the contract that you're not going to add feature xxx either. Surely his logic is absolutely flawed?
Any thoughts?
Ta
#3
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:17 PM
This doesn't specially say 'the price doesn't inline me adding 300 off products for you afterwards'.
He's using this as his main basis for dispute.
#4
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:20 PM
Interpretation wise I think you are correct and adding product data would be extra work and therefore chargable.
Put this one down to experience, next time you do an ecom site make sure that adding of product data (or not) is covered in the contract.
Work out a price if you want to do the work!
#5
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:23 PM
If through email/print can you tell us word for word what the quote was for?
rallport, on 12 April 2010 - 04:17 PM, said:
This doesn't specially say 'the price doesn't inline me adding 300 off products for you afterwards'.
He's using this as his main basis for dispute.
#6
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:35 PM
Have been doing websites commervcially for close to 2 years now and this is the first time I've beene xpected to do such a thing.
I'd also be pretty surprised if web companies explicitly said 'we won't be adding products' - it's totally non standard practice.
#7
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:46 PM
Personally I would not add the products as a point of principal but it is easy say that from looking in.
rallport, on 12 April 2010 - 04:35 PM, said:
Have been doing websites commervcially for close to 2 years now and this is the first time I've beene xpected to do such a thing.
I'd also be pretty surprised if web companies explicitly said 'we won't be adding products' - it's totally non standard practice.
#8
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:50 PM
nellyshark, on 12 April 2010 - 04:46 PM, said:
Personally I would not add the products as a point of principal but it is easy say that from looking in.
I'd love to do this, but the client still owes £1200 (has already paid a further £1200 upfront).
#9
Posted 12 April 2010 - 04:59 PM
I know in my own contract that I have it stated that client is to provide all content within a set number of days and if they haven't then I am legally entitled to charge the full amount and ownership does not pass over until the full amount has been received. If they wish to cancel then I can also keep the deposit and if that does not cover work done then I am entitled to charge a further 150 per hour worked.
Even if you cannot provide the quote word for word can you provide a sample without any names or prices?
rallport, on 12 April 2010 - 04:50 PM, said:
#10
Posted 12 April 2010 - 06:14 PM
It was said to him that it wasn't part of the original quote so we would have to charge extra for it, but he turned around and said that he was under the impression that we were to populate his store as well and that we never said that we wouldn't be doing this. In the end we had to do it as there was still a large part of the bill left for him to pay and he was refusing to do it.
So now on the site in the T&C's is that the price given for e-commerce site is for the design, software and 10 products to be uploaded, providing all relevant information is given. If they want all their products to be uploaded they will be charged the hourly rate to do so.
This is also mentioned on any quotes given, along with a bit about how the quote is for the features stated and any features that are requested that aren't in the list are subject to an additional charge.
It is just one of those learning experiences, and I have worked for 2 start up companies and seen them both go through all sorts of situations with clients and amends of the way their businesses are ran. Common sense just goes out the window with some clients and they do think that if they buy a 2 page static website they can then get a 20 page CMS for the same price as the original quote.
So really you have two options. 1st one being just do it. 2nd one being stick to your guns and say that you will happily do it but as it was never discussed it will charge them extra...if they argue then explain it to him using what he sell, for example its like you ordering 3 bottles of vodka off him and then deciding that you want 300 instead for the same price.
#11
Posted 12 April 2010 - 09:01 PM
Tricky one, a hell of a lot of work in your case and a lot of money involved, go with your gut feeling, or come meet him half way.
But i think in your case i would charge him lol
#12
Posted 12 April 2010 - 09:18 PM
Dizi, on 12 April 2010 - 06:14 PM, said:
I work in insurance and people always go on about how boring and tedious the documents etc are unfortunately its due to people like above and your client rallport that they have got so long winded and complicated. I think in this instance you may have to comply and learn from it.
Sorry to be blunt
Torrix
#13
Posted 12 April 2010 - 10:54 PM
Just a thought.
Regards,
www.FreeResellersPanel.com
#14
Posted 13 April 2010 - 08:14 AM
freeresellers, on 12 April 2010 - 10:54 PM, said:
Just a thought.
Regards,
www.FreeResellersPanel.com
Is a bespoke system we've made him. I did ask him about a database backup, but he deleted his old site has soon as he told me to proceed with the new site.
It's alos not as simple as restoring a database from a backup as his new store is lot more involved than his old one. E.g. he now has several product attributes, a better category structure and additional information to store for each product - before he literally only had a price, a sentence for the prod description and a small image.
#15
Posted 13 April 2010 - 08:16 AM
As said, if this was a personal prject I'd stand my ground and not do this out of principal. But as this has been done commercially and my boss is obv. concerned about reputation. The situation sucks
#16
Posted 13 April 2010 - 09:09 AM
I would quietly offer to upload the products for the client, but for a fee, and take the site down until agreement has been reached. I'm also assuming that the products and images would be provided so that they could be added to the database directly, which might save some time.
I've never had any client expect this, it must be hard to take.
#17
Posted 13 April 2010 - 09:48 AM
Have just found the original email is ent him. Atb the very bottom under the optional extras section it says:
[i]Importing existing product information into the system (if possible) - £155[/i]
This is just an extra I put on in case they had a database backup that I can import to speed things up.
What do you reckon?
#18
Posted 13 April 2010 - 09:58 AM
I would be careful how you broach the topic however and remind the client that I was them, not you, who deleted the previous database.
rallport, on 13 April 2010 - 09:48 AM, said:
Have just found the original email is ent him. Atb the very bottom under the optional extras section it says:
[i]Importing existing product information into the system (if possible) - £155[/i]
This is just an extra I put on in case they had a database backup that I can import to speed things up.
What do you reckon?
#19
Posted 13 April 2010 - 10:12 AM
#21
Posted 13 April 2010 - 11:38 AM
He seems fine with all this now and isn't as annoyed today
I'm going to add him 30 products, spead across all his categories.
#24
Posted 13 April 2010 - 03:48 PM
#25
Posted 15 April 2010 - 11:22 AM
#26
Posted 17 April 2010 - 04:22 PM
oneeyedpauly, on 15 April 2010 - 11:22 AM, said:
Well it's lucky I did actually mention it at the very bottom of the quote
Have come to the conclusion that some people are simpy out to take the **** tbh
#27
Posted 22 April 2010 - 08:48 PM
#28
Posted 27 April 2010 - 09:04 AM
banter, on 22 April 2010 - 08:48 PM, said:
No need now.
Managed to get my hands on his existing products database, which was a MS Access database, so easy to get imported into MySQL.
Help






















