simianman, on Jun 14 2009, 03:05, said:
Expression Engine gets a lot of press on this site, but are commercial CMS the best way to go - think one team vs hundreds/thousands of teams working on modules and add ons as is the case with open source.
If you follow the link below you will see that this site's prefered CMS is EE, however, take a closer look at the numerous links to EE on the page and you'll see they all contain the suffix 'index.php?affiliate=wdf" - rather dilutes their praise in my humble opinion!!
http://www.webdesignerforum.co.uk/index.ph...;f=23&id=13
The affiliate link belongs to Ben, this site's owner, and any income helps to pay for the sites running costs
As to your question about using commercial CMS's the main point should always be to use the CMS that is
most suitable for the project - whether the software is free or costs £1,000 is irrelevant to any professional.
With the one vs thousands of module developers both approaches have pros and cons, but I don't think that argument really stands up since the "right CMS for the job" shouldn't need many (if any) addons since functionality will already be built in.
It might be great to have 1000's of addons available for XYZ free software but that raises several possible issues;
1. Multiple addons that do the same thing
2. Poor quality control
3. Weak security
4. Abandoned projects
5. Infrequent updates
6. No developer support when you're stuck
Conversely, commercial software offers a different set of rules;
1. Most functionality is part of the core CMS negating the need for oodles of addons
2. Stricter quality control (if it's a crap product the developer will go out of business very quickly)
3. Fewer abandoned products since they provide a living for the developer
4. Updates to co-incide with core CMS updates or add new features
5. Developer support provided